<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rationality Behind Pet Spending [Reader Comment]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/</link>
	<description>Rebalance before it's too late</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:11:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: moncler baume</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-87943</link>
		<dc:creator>moncler baume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-87943</guid>
		<description>comfortable as well as comfortable understanding. Just like the actual variety of dress products moncler aubertaccessible inside this particular brand determine, the data a customer will get could be various. riticality, Down Jackets Moncler is almost always dissimilar to this kind of a good dgree how the consumers vismoncler jacket stores lookingmonclers for the actual Moncler coats as well as brand by yourself personal. Having a significantly more contemporary component is generally a hooded lower coat, and that is an individual moncler aubertalong Moncler Jackets For Women the newest versions. Whichever function as the material, moncler breslethe actual comfort</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comfortable as well as comfortable understanding. Just like the actual variety of dress products moncler aubertaccessible inside this particular brand determine, the data a customer will get could be various. riticality, Down Jackets Moncler is almost always dissimilar to this kind of a good dgree how the consumers vismoncler jacket stores lookingmonclers for the actual Moncler coats as well as brand by yourself personal. Having a significantly more contemporary component is generally a hooded lower coat, and that is an individual moncler aubertalong Moncler Jackets For Women the newest versions. Whichever function as the material, moncler breslethe actual comfort</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moncler baume</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-87932</link>
		<dc:creator>moncler baume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-87932</guid>
		<description>obtain wmoncler jackethin addmoncler jacketional brand tmoncler jacketles. Moncler Jackets was first fine throughout the winter months relating to 2011, a number of celebrates are typically profoundly in recognize the value of utilizing Moncler low-priced coating Moncler low-priced coating regarding girls additionally moncler aubertadult males. W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obtain wmoncler jackethin addmoncler jacketional brand tmoncler jacketles. Moncler Jackets was first fine throughout the winter months relating to 2011, a number of celebrates are typically profoundly in recognize the value of utilizing Moncler low-priced coating Moncler low-priced coating regarding girls additionally moncler aubertadult males. W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moncler baume</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-87927</link>
		<dc:creator>moncler baume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-87927</guid>
		<description>Obviously a popular topic, The Amateur Financier also discussed the Suze Orman/Dave Ramsey Issue. Take a peek for another post on thetopic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously a popular topic, The Amateur Financier also discussed the Suze Orman/Dave Ramsey Issue. Take a peek for another post on thetopic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 06:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>First, I like the concept of money as &#039;liquid effort&#039;.  When you&#039;re young and working for the bulk of your money, thinking of expenditures in terms of how long you would need to work to earn the money or vice versa, the amount of money you could earn by working rather than doing something else, isn&#039;t a bad way to view how you spend your money or free time.  Although, it does put you in the position of trying to decide whether each hour of TV is worth the loss of theoretical income.

Going back to the post that inspired this comment, I think part of the problem is the &#039;big sum, all at once&#039; issue.  If you told someone that your pet had a disease that required food costing an extra $25 dollars each month, hardly anyone would bat an eye, while spending $3000 in one fell swoop for, say, an operation, tends to draw quite a reaction.  This occurs even though the total amount for the former situation will equal $3000 after ten years (if my math is right) and can ultimately cost more.  Just one of the many quirks of human nature.

As for the suggested retorts to someone questioning your priorities (particularly in favoring your pet over a nameless foreign human), while they are good in theory, I&#039;d hold on using them in real discussions.  At best, you can expect to get more flack from anyone who doesn&#039;t understand your connection to your pet (which is pretty much anyone who would raise this objection to begin with), and at worst, you can find yourself arguing all your spending priorities with someone who not only doesn&#039;t watch TV, but works a part time job for more money to donate to his pet causes in order to &#039;give more back&#039;.  Finding yourself being questioned about whether you&#039;ve cut back on your television viewing in order to work more to, in turn, cover your pet&#039;s expenses is not really the sort of conversation that anyone wants to have with a (soon-to-be former) friend.
.-= Roger&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/theamateurfinancier/cFiv/~3/gO6gq8xov6Y/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Some of My Pet Peeves&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I like the concept of money as &#8216;liquid effort&#8217;.  When you&#8217;re young and working for the bulk of your money, thinking of expenditures in terms of how long you would need to work to earn the money or vice versa, the amount of money you could earn by working rather than doing something else, isn&#8217;t a bad way to view how you spend your money or free time.  Although, it does put you in the position of trying to decide whether each hour of TV is worth the loss of theoretical income.</p>
<p>Going back to the post that inspired this comment, I think part of the problem is the &#8216;big sum, all at once&#8217; issue.  If you told someone that your pet had a disease that required food costing an extra $25 dollars each month, hardly anyone would bat an eye, while spending $3000 in one fell swoop for, say, an operation, tends to draw quite a reaction.  This occurs even though the total amount for the former situation will equal $3000 after ten years (if my math is right) and can ultimately cost more.  Just one of the many quirks of human nature.</p>
<p>As for the suggested retorts to someone questioning your priorities (particularly in favoring your pet over a nameless foreign human), while they are good in theory, I&#8217;d hold on using them in real discussions.  At best, you can expect to get more flack from anyone who doesn&#8217;t understand your connection to your pet (which is pretty much anyone who would raise this objection to begin with), and at worst, you can find yourself arguing all your spending priorities with someone who not only doesn&#8217;t watch TV, but works a part time job for more money to donate to his pet causes in order to &#8216;give more back&#8217;.  Finding yourself being questioned about whether you&#8217;ve cut back on your television viewing in order to work more to, in turn, cover your pet&#8217;s expenses is not really the sort of conversation that anyone wants to have with a (soon-to-be former) friend.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Roger&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/theamateurfinancier/cFiv/~3/gO6gq8xov6Y/" rel="nofollow">Some of My Pet Peeves</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.myliferoi.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOD&#38;PI</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>LOD&#38;PI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>there&#039;s a lot more to life than working as hard as you can for money and saving everyone else&#039;s life. Optimizing to the nth degree takes an infinite amount of effort!

having a pet is about bringing joy in your life. if you&#039;d rather adopt an orphan that&#039;s your choice, but you shouldn&#039;t expect everyone else to have the same level of commitment.
.-= Living Off Dividends &amp; Passive Income´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://livingoffdividends.com/2009/08/24/how-to-invest-like-china/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How To Invest Like China&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s a lot more to life than working as hard as you can for money and saving everyone else&#8217;s life. Optimizing to the nth degree takes an infinite amount of effort!</p>
<p>having a pet is about bringing joy in your life. if you&#8217;d rather adopt an orphan that&#8217;s your choice, but you shouldn&#8217;t expect everyone else to have the same level of commitment.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Living Off Dividends &#038; Passive Income´s last blog ..<a href="http://livingoffdividends.com/2009/08/24/how-to-invest-like-china/" rel="nofollow">How To Invest Like China</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.myliferoi.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyLifeROI</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>MyLifeROI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>@fern, 

Pet insurance, like auto insurance and health insurance and every other type of insurance, is a way to smooth out your expected expenditures by pooling your risk.

The normal argument is that &quot;$100 per month for 10 years won&#039;t effect you nearly as much as a $1,000 bill all at once.&quot; Now, if you put $100 per month into an expected pet spending account or something, that is different.

Do realize, though, that the main reason I posted this comment was for his rationalization of pet spending, not so much his advocacy of pet insurance (even though I do understand where he is coming from).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@fern, </p>
<p>Pet insurance, like auto insurance and health insurance and every other type of insurance, is a way to smooth out your expected expenditures by pooling your risk.</p>
<p>The normal argument is that &#8220;$100 per month for 10 years won&#8217;t effect you nearly as much as a $1,000 bill all at once.&#8221; Now, if you put $100 per month into an expected pet spending account or something, that is different.</p>
<p>Do realize, though, that the main reason I posted this comment was for his rationalization of pet spending, not so much his advocacy of pet insurance (even though I do understand where he is coming from).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyLifeROI</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>MyLifeROI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>@Stephanie PTY, 

You could always get a hypoallergenic cat right?! I have no idea what they cost, I just know they exist :)

&quot;A Hedge Against Loneliness&quot; -- I like that... I&#039;ll have to bring that up with someone next time they bring up pet spending!

Thanks for your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stephanie PTY, </p>
<p>You could always get a hypoallergenic cat right?! I have no idea what they cost, I just know they exist :)</p>
<p>&#8220;A Hedge Against Loneliness&#8221; &#8212; I like that&#8230; I&#8217;ll have to bring that up with someone next time they bring up pet spending!</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fern</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>fern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think pet insurance for cats makes sense becus,  having been a lifetime cat owner, my experience has been that they don&#039;t get sick until they&#039;re seriously ill, and when that happens, i spend out of pocket rather than shell out $100 a year for 10 years with no need.  My cats are indoor cats so that eliminates the need for risky vaccinations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think pet insurance for cats makes sense becus,  having been a lifetime cat owner, my experience has been that they don&#8217;t get sick until they&#8217;re seriously ill, and when that happens, i spend out of pocket rather than shell out $100 a year for 10 years with no need.  My cats are indoor cats so that eliminates the need for risky vaccinations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie PTY</title>
		<link>http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie PTY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myliferoi.com/2009/08/rationality-behind-pet-spending-reader-comment/#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>That truly is a great comment, thanks for sharing it MLR! I&#039;ve had animals all of my life, up until moving out of my parents house a week ago. There&#039;s something very lonesome about being in an empty apartment, with no kitty! (I&#039;d love to get one, but my boyfriend is allergic.) I&#039;m sure it would be different if I hadn&#039;t grown up with animals, but it&#039;s still a very real feeling of loneliness. I think pet spending is a lot like spending money to go out with friends, or see a friend: it&#039;s a hedge against loneliness. Pets bring a lot of entertainment and enjoyment, but their main function is companionship. That&#039;s a hard thing to put a price on, which is why people struggle with the question of how much to spend to save the life of their pets, I think.
.-= Stephanie PTY&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoorerThanYou/~3/Q_Th8HUxbUo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Announcing the Back-to-School Shuffle for a Shuffle Giveaway!&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That truly is a great comment, thanks for sharing it MLR! I&#8217;ve had animals all of my life, up until moving out of my parents house a week ago. There&#8217;s something very lonesome about being in an empty apartment, with no kitty! (I&#8217;d love to get one, but my boyfriend is allergic.) I&#8217;m sure it would be different if I hadn&#8217;t grown up with animals, but it&#8217;s still a very real feeling of loneliness. I think pet spending is a lot like spending money to go out with friends, or see a friend: it&#8217;s a hedge against loneliness. Pets bring a lot of entertainment and enjoyment, but their main function is companionship. That&#8217;s a hard thing to put a price on, which is why people struggle with the question of how much to spend to save the life of their pets, I think.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Stephanie PTY&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoorerThanYou/~3/Q_Th8HUxbUo/" rel="nofollow">Announcing the Back-to-School Shuffle for a Shuffle Giveaway!</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.myliferoi.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

